Leadership and Team Dynamics for McCann Model- myassignmenthelp

Question: Discuss about theLeadership and Team Dynamics for McCann Model. Answer: Introduction The following paper discussed on the roles of the team members and the way they can perform their roles in the organization. The team members always want to perform their roles positively so they can contribute positively to the needs of the organization and how they can put their best efforts to make the organization achieve their success. This is why the leaders of the organization always go on to take the major responsibility of distributing the work pressures among the employees. This helps the employees to get the best results within their job roles. The good performance of the employees can lead them to get the rewards and recognitions within the organization and get a good reputation among the customers as well. The team roles will have to be specified by the team leaders and get the best results by performing their roles very effectively indeed. There are some models that will be used here. One of the most significant models in specifying the job roles is the Belbin model. Th e other strategic model used is the Margerison and McCann model. These roles will really be effective for them to be used in the organizations. The proper application of these strategies or models will lead them to get the most effective results indeed. The importance of the team role The distribution of the team roles is very important in all the organizations. It is the role of the team members to provide the best efforts for the benefits of the organization. The team members have to engage themselves in the team environment (Meredith 2017). The office environment is sometimes very adverse for the team members and this is why they have to make some strategies by which they can organize their works in a proper manner. the teams must have the proper potential and the responsibilities by which they can undertake their jobs in the organizations (Summers, Humphrey and Ferris 2012). This will have to be portrayed in time of their works. The expertise of the team members will lead them to achieve the profits and build a strong relationship with the customers as well. The communication is a very challenging issue in the organizations and the team members have to show they can perform their best efforts within the organization (Summers, Humphrey and Ferris 2012) The team leaders will have to be very strict about their works and take the charges on how they can get their works effectively done. The team members must be able to show them the way of how to complete their jobs within the time (Nancarrow et al. 2013). The team leaders and the managers of the companies must be able to create the charts about the structure of the works properly. Thus they would be able to complete their works by gaining the expertise. The teams of the various departments will have different kinds of works. Otherwise, the organization will not be able to work properly by maintaining all the rules (Bennett and Gadlin 2012). This is why the organizations must define the job roles of the teams within a certain time after their joining. The hierarchy of the organization will go on to make the specific roles for the specific employees. The team members need certain skills and expertise so they can be successful in playing their roles successfully. The leadership styles of the team leaders and managers are very important in this context since this will help the teams to develop the proper strategies and implement them within the organizational settings (Goleman 2017). The team members want such kind of leaders who will always cater to the needs of the employees and suggest them the various ways by which they will be complete their jobs effectively. The teams can go on to get the best achievements if they have the best communications and work coherently indeed. Thus the leaders can be able to motivate the employees in the best ways. The leaders should always allow the creative innovation strategies within the team and apply them so they could bring success within the projects that the teams go on to undertake (Du et al. 2013). Belbin model of team dynamics Belbin model introduces the various roles of the teams within the teams and discussed on how they should be implemented within the team (Belbin 2012). If the managers and the organizational leaders do not state the roles and responsibilities to the team properly, the teams will not be able to gain the full potential and achieve the desired objectives for the organizations. It has been seen in many cases that some of the team members are not able to complete the defined job roles for the team (Certo 2018). If they are unable to do so, this will probably affect the entire performance of the team. Thus the team members will need to address the various situations in the best ways and perform their job roles properly. The experts have observed that some of the employees, who are experts in providing the inputs for the betterment of the procedure, are not able to deliver the goods at the most vital time (Rico et al. 2012). This can definitely happen if the employees are not being able to see the broader picture of the industry and their working capacities. One of the most important purposes of building an efficient team is to include several team members who are conscious about their job roles and willing to deliver their best efforts. Thus they can build up a strong and responsible team. The team roles specified by Meredith Belbin are structured by the observed behavior of the styles of working of the employees (Belbin 2012) The interpersonal communication has a very big place in the understanding of the team roles. There are nine team roles for the employees within the organization. These are resource investigator, team worker, coordinator, plant, monitor evaluator, specialist, shaper, implementer and complete finisher. The resource investigators are very energetic, outgoing and have enthusiasm for all the works. They can develop all the contacts with the customers and utilizes all the opportunities. They are supposed to be too much optimistic about everything. The resource investigators might not remember their duties to follow up on the team leads (Belbin 2012) The team workers are always cooperative, diplomatic and have proper perceptions about everything. They are unable to take the proper decisions within a proper time and this can lead them to take ineffective decisions in the difficult situations for the organizations. They can hesitate to take the decisions (Belbin 2012) The coordinators are generally very mature and confident. The team needs this type of people who are clear about their objectives and can identify the talents. However, these people are manipulative to some extent and they look to delegate their works among the different workers and reducing their own pressures. (Belbin 2012) The plants are very much needed in the concerned teams. They are very creative, full of imagination and think freely. They can solve difficult problems. They are very much preoccupied with their thoughts. They are forgetful and this can affect their decision making to a large level. The monitor evaluators have good strategic planning and sober in their approach. This is why their judgment power is very much appropriate. They are not able to inspire the other people within their organization (Belbin 2012) This works as a backdrop for them. However, these kinds of people are needed in the organizations as well. They are very slow in taking the decisions. The team members in the concerned organizations should be able to take the decisions properly within the given time. It is because this would enable them to be effective in the difficult times of the organization. The specialists are indeed needed in the organizations so they can work with extreme dedication (Belbin 2012) They have specialist knowledge and skills about everything so they can provide the best for the organizations. The specialists have such pool of information that the other employees will be overloaded with them. The shapers fall on the next category of the team roles. They like to take the challenges, are very dynamic and can handle much pressure (Belbin 2012) They are really precious for the organizations. The managers should give them special opportunities for the progress in their fields. They are very aggressive and this could work as a problem for them when dealing with the customers. They can be provoked by others and hurt the sentiments of the customers. The need for the shapers is important but after delegating these shortcomings (Dyer and Dyer 2013). The need for the implementers is very high in the organizations. They are very practical, reliable for the customers and efficient. They are needed for the benefits of the organizations in the best ways. They organize all the works very effectively. They are not such flexible to use the new possibilities in the businesses. This shortcoming of theirs should be overcome in different ways. The complete finishers are the last kind of team roles in the teams. They are very anxious about all the works. They thrive for perfection in their works. This is why they are very often accused of the extreme perfectionism in their works. They set the highest measure of the quality control in the organizations. This model is very effective to define the team roles within an organization and the implementers, shapers, monitor evaluator and specialists are very much needed for the perfect growth of the organization (Senaratne and Gunawardane 2015). Margerison and McCann model Another important model or strategy to describe the team roles within the organizations is the Margerison and McCann model (Margerison and McCann 2013). There are some purposes to use this model in the best interest of the organizational benefits. The employees must have to relate with other people like the internal and external stakeholders. They have to gather the most necessary information about the internal and external environment of the organization. The employees will have to make the perfect decisions within the organizational settings (Pavlovich, Fedorovna and Yaroslavovna 2015). They have to organize themselves properly and provide the organizations with the best understanding. This will enhance the overall performance of the organization. The team role preferences for this model are:- The first role is reporter-adviser. They enjoy the collecting and utilizing the information. The second role is creator-innovator. They always provide new ideas for the organization which are indeed effective. The organizations must retain these kinds of employees because they are indeed precious for their skills (Mathieu et al. 2015). The third role is the explorer-promoter. They like to explore the new opportunities and venture into new prospects. The companies should also use this strategy for their growth (Margerison and McCann 2013) The fourth role is the assessor-developer. The develop the new ideas within the organization and implement them. This is also one of the best strategies for the increasing tye success. The next role is thruster-organizer. They always are of the opinion to get the positive results by pushing the employees. The next category of team role is concluder-producer. They always are of the opinion to control the operations in a systematic manner. This is why it brings good results. The organizations should take up this strategy for their benefit (McCann 2012). The next type of team role is controller-inspector. These people always keep their focus on several details and put them into use. The last kind of team role is upholder-maintainer. They are the ones who uphold the standards of the work for the organizations (Foyil and Kleiner 2015). This is a promising thing because this helps the organizations to maintain their stability in the competitive environment. This is why Margerison and McCann model is very much important and there are very small differences between this model and Belbin model since they both look to enhance the performance of the teams. Conclusion This paper can be concluded by saying that both Belbin model and Margerison and McCann model are very significant in improving the business performance of the organization. It is indeed better to make comparisons between these models and say that the roles of teams vary according to the situations. The teams should be efficient, innovative, systematic and very smooth operating as well. References Belbin, R.M., 2012.Team roles at work. Routledge. Bennett, L.M. and Gadlin, H., 2012. Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice.Journal of Investigative Medicine,60(5), pp.768-775. Certo, S.C., 2018.Supervision: Concepts and skill-building. McGraw-Hill Education. Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A. and Sen, S., 2013. The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility.Journal of business ethics,114(1), pp.155-169. Dyer, W.G. and Dyer, J.H., 2013.Team building: Proven strategies for improving team performance. John Wiley Sons. Foyil, S. and Kleiner, B., 2015. Excellence In Team Management.Ethics Critical Thinking Journal,2015(3). Goleman, D., 2017.Leadership That Gets Results (Harvard Business Review Classics). Harvard Business Press. Margerison, C. and McCann, D., 2013. Measures which help you work together as a team.Executive Development. Mathieu, J.E., Tannenbaum, S.I., Kukenberger, M.R., Donsbach, J.S. and Alliger, G.M., 2015. Team role experience and orientation: A measure and tests of construct validity.Group Organization Management,40(1), pp.6-34. McCann, D., 2012.How to Influence Others at Work. Routledge. MEREDITH, R., 2017.TEAM ROLES AT WORK. ROUTLEDGE. Nancarrow, S.A., Booth, A., Ariss, S., Smith, T., Enderby, P. and Roots, A., 2013. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work.Human resources for Health,11(1), p.19. Pavlovich, A.A., Fedorovna, R.V. and Yaroslavovna, S.V., 2015. Comparative study of approaches to assessment of informal roles in a working (student) group.Austrian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (5-6). Rico, R., Snchez-Manzanares, M., Antino, M. and Lau, D., 2012. Bridging team faultlines by combining task role assignment and goal structure strategies.Journal of Applied Psychology,97(2), p.407. Senaratne, S. and Gunawardane, S., 2015. Application of team role theory to construction design teams.Architectural Engineering and Design Management,11(1), pp.1-20. Summers, J.K., Humphrey, S.E. and Ferris, G.R., 2012. Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability.Academy of Management Journal,55(2), pp.314-338.